Now, after having read the work again, I’m prepared to revise my earlier judgment on it somewhat. The skinny is that I still didn’t enjoy the third part very much, but I do see how he was probably planning it to go in that direction from the start.
That is, reading the first two parts with knowledge of
what’s in store in the third part, it was easy to see how he was laying the
groundwork for the Aomame-Tengo love story right from the start. Indeed, it was possible (I’m assured by my
wife) to see that coming a mile away – what other reason would there be for
paralleling a single man and a single woman of the same age like that? Of
course they’re going to get together.
To which my response is, well, Kafka and Nakata didn’t “get together” in
Kafka on the Shore, and I and the Rat
didn’t in Pinball, 1973, so I think
(protecting my ego) that there was good reason, grounded in a careful reading
of Murakami’s oeuvre, not to assume
that this was going to end up as a love story.
But in fact it did, and hey:
rereading it, I can see him telegraphing it pretty clearly. From the beginning, this was always going to
be that kind of novel. And this
telegraphing comes on the subtextual level as well as in terms of the
plot. It was that kind of novel all
along not just because structurally it had to end with the two storylines being
united, the two would-be lovers consummating it, but because one of the deep
themes of the book is solipsism and its discontents. As the Homeric taxi driver warns Aomame at
the outset, there’s only one reality, despite appearances – this isn’t a parallel worlds novel – but at
the same time, we know that not everybody perceives the world the same. For some people, it’s a world with two
moons; for others, it’s not. Each of us lives in our own world,
intentionally or not, and we can never know completely how much that world is
“real,” that is, how much it overlaps with the individualized worlds those
around us are living in. There may only
be one reality, but who can access it, and how can they know if they do? The 9/Q business is setting this up for
us: but the movement of the novel is
inexorably toward the merging of Tengo’s and Aomame’s separate worlds. I can see that now. The climax of the thing was always going to
be two people (two separate worlds) agreeing to commit to each other (to merge
their worlds into one). I get that. I can appreciate that he’s doing that.
And I can see how that fits in cleanly with the rest of his
career. Withdrawal into one’s own
private world vs. getting out and engaging with everybody else’s world. Solitude vs. commitment to a
relationship. Self vs. non-self. This is his big theme, and he’s revisiting it
here. Okay.
None of that new appreciation fundamentally changes how I
feel about the book, though. The love
story he chose to tell is still a retelling of the Hajime-Shimamoto story, only
this time Hajime is right to be
saving himself for his mostly-imaginary childhood crush. And so is Aomame. Granted that this works better on the fantasy
level on which this story takes place, still it’s a retreat from the mature,
realistic, even cynical take on adult relationships that has characterized his
work so far. Gone is the messiness of
actually trying to make a relationship work (and usually failing), gone is the
tension between real-life relationships and fantasy perfect lovers. Here the triumphal commitment is to the ideal lover of memory and
imagination. In 1992 Murakami knew that
this could not actually bring resolution or happiness. Hajime was doomed the moment he embraced Shimamoto,
because she wasn’t real. Here we’re
supposed to rejoice over Aomame and Tengo getting together after twenty years,
never yet having had a real conversation, but already committing to starting a
family together… It just doesn’t work
for me. It’s a fantasy, and maybe if you
can find it beautiful on a fantasy level it works for you, but that particular
fantasy doesn’t really appeal to me.
So. There.
There have been hints and rumors about a fourth book. I’ll believe it when I see it. I can imagine
a fourth book that would redeem the series somewhat. Volume 3 is still, aside from all of the
above points, a dull read, and
nothing can change that. But a fourth
book could return to the blithely-abandoned Little People/Sakigake storyline
and wrap things up in a more satisfying manner.
After all, the end of Vol. 3 drops strong hints that Aomame and Tengo’s
little one is more than just the signifier of their true love, it’s somehow the
new Sakigake prophet, or more. And
Sakigake is after it. Maybe in Vol. 4
Fukaeri and Komatsu and Buzzcut and the Little People all come back and it all
builds to a rousing climax that follows through on the social critiques begun
in the first two volumes. Maybe. But at the moment, that hasn’t happened in this reality. We’re left with Vol. 3 as the final word on
this fictional world. And it feels
pretty final, if not satisfying.
2 comments:
I happened to read 1Q84 and Naoki Urasawa's 20th Century Boys at the same time last fall. Aside from stories he published in the New Yorker, it was my first time reading Murakami . And I enjoyed 1Q84 more than you did - probably because I knew so little about his earlier work.
I know you read some of Billy Bat by Urasawa a while back and I was wondering if you ever read 20th Century Boys. I ask because I noticed dozens and dozens of similarities between the 1Q84 and 20CB. So many that it seems noteworthy even if I don't know what to make of it. It just seems remarkable that two major works by two major Japanese writers working at the same time would have so many things (for example: cults, strangely powerful manuscripts, boobs, songs, certain names, things that happened to the characters when they were 10 shaping the rest of their lives and much more) in common. I've looked around to see if anyone else has noticed this but I can't find anything. I don't read Japanese - surely its been mentioned by Japanese critics, right?
I did . I'm reading 1q84(1st book) and it's very similar to 20cb (the lider = Friend)
Post a Comment